le tribunal administratif va prendre sa décision sur les étudiants menacés d’expulsion par le Crous
Before the judge, each party stuck to its positions. The representative of the legal department of the Crous repeated that the renewal requests were not made on time for two of them, that the school certificate of another did not meet the criteria at the time of its request, and that the last had seen his request refused for repeated nocturnal disturbances.
Inability to relocate
She also met many appointments with the social workers beforehand to try to find solutions. The representative also indicates that they had to accommodate the students who were to take possession of the rooms at the hotel while waiting for them to be released. She also argues that financial aid was paid, but the students said after the hearing that they had not reimbursed it.
For his part, M.e Romain Foucard, who defended the students, refuted the arguments put forward by the Crous and insisted on the urgency of their situation: “These are foreign students who have no response solution. The lawyer argued that they met all the criteria for access to CROUS accommodation, explaining the situations of each student to support his point.