Siena (+ Mirandola): “This is why the vote against the naming of the park after Berlinguer” – SulPanaro
MIRANDOLA- Regarding the rejection in the Council of the advance from the Civic Left to name the park of Mirandola after Enrico Berlinguer Giorgio Siena- from the civic list + Mirandola- has released the following clarifications:
“With regard to the note of the Civic Left I take that on the one hand we would like to act a model of positive behavior in politics and then it refers in an approximate and untruthful way what was declared as a civic list + Mirandola, how to be well understood by listening to the recording of the City Council, available on the website of the municipality of Mirandola.
I stated that I thought that a similar discussion could be avoided, a few from the elections – also characterized by outdated ideological conflicts with respect to the prevalence of programs. True the petition was filed in July, but the presenters could ask for enrollment at a later date, but still this did not determine for my vote.
What is proposed, both in the introduction and at the end of my speech, on the fact that the toponymy of Mirandola does not recognize any personality of the First Republic from 1948 to 1992, and that I think it is right to recognize the protagonists of a long period of the history of Italy also via an address by the City Council. It also seemed incongruous to me that the first and only name of all that history was of the one who, for known reasons, was a partisan and never assumed an institutional role.
The proposal of the name of Berlinguer was accompanied by a set of political considerations on Eurocommunism, workerism and the moral question that for the vote and presupposed sharing and, as far as I’m concerned, I did not feel obliged to argue that I never shared.
As for the unconditional praise to Bettino Craxio, he reported verbatim what he declared: “Eurocommunism did not exist as a culture of government, but the Socialists, Social Democrats and Labor of Europe did exist. When Craxi, new secretary of the PSI in 1976, said that, in all, history unequivocally testified to the failure of communism and the victory of the socialists, he was accused by Berlinguer of genetically mutating the PSI, to the point of being pointed out as a danger to democracy . Berlinguer never came to recognize the political victory of the European socialists and the PCI waited for the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 to acknowledge it. It will be, think for a while, Craxi to accompany Occhetto’s registration to the Socialist International of the PDS and Matteo Renzi to join the European Socialist Group with the Democratic Party ”.
It is simply facts.
With reference to the Mani Pulite Sinistra Civica pool, he speaks of “irrelevant considerations and veiled insinuations”. I have not made any insinuation on the Mani Pulite pool, but an open consideration on the incorrect action of the magistrates in the investigation, with the abuse of preventive detention. All the more so since the magistrates of that pool have distinguished themselves then who for attempted political careers of modest value, who inspires for justice movements that have been raging on Italian politics for some decades.
On the fact that Berlinguer was really entitled to put morality, illegal financing of politics by now everyone knows as a matter of how things are done and how this is a question of falsification of gods.
I am sorry to come into conflict with the petitioners, including people with whom I have collaborated in the past and shared political commitments.
But I have always respected their opinions and I do so even now. I expect the same behavior ”.
sulPanaro.net – Newspaper registered at the Court of Modena aut. 20/2017