It was taken back with the authorization given by the law of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality.
The Ministry of U and Infrastructure violated the circular issued by the Law No. 5216 to “prepare, plan and plan for all public transport” given to the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM). The unlawfulness of the judiciary began with the training services of Sabiha Gökçen Airport.
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS
The tender for urban transportation services was made by IETT. The Ministry of Transport has given the tender authority for the transportation service to issue the circular numbered 2021/5 from the airport operation to the private enterprise. Havabus won the tender for IMM’s transportation to Sabi Gökçen Airport in 2011. Upon completion of the circular, the operating company is also handed over.
Based on the circular, the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure was not taken into account in the tender in favorable conditions. “Having ministerial authority, allocation of space, choosing UKOME”, the Havaist firm that won to complete the purchase, started to start revenue without choosing UKOME.
IMM WINS THE CASE
IMM opened the generalization because it did not want the lawsuit to be filed. The 8th Chamber of the Council of State found the evidence of IMM justified, “It cannot be interpreted as to abolish the authority given to municipalities by law”. It was decided to define the circular published by the Ministry. However, the election of the Council of State is not implemented.
IMM, on the other hand, began to impose fines on the stops, passenger reception and transportation in the city.