Kissinger’s statement – how Ukraine received a signal about NATO
I would say very expensive. Kissinger was always in favor of us being part of the West, but was against NATO membership.
On the topic This is the recognition of Ukraine as a strong player – Musienko on the change in Kissinger’s rhetoric
And lately he has been “looping” a bit. Now the words indicate that the West’s vision of its geopolitics has finally changed. It is more correct to say that the Ukrainians changed it.
Kissinger always says what I don’t want to say in Western capitals. After the EU candidate status, we received an unofficial signal regarding NATO. The West made its bet.
Topical The rhetoric has changed radically: Kissinger urged not to treat the territories of Ukraine
More on Kissinger’s application:
- Kissinger in an interview The Wall Street Journal confirmed that “after the way Russia behaved in Ukraine”, Ukraine should be treated as a member of NATO.
- He allowed a “settlement” that would supposedly preserve the territory of Russia that was occupied in 2014, although he had no answers to the question of how such a settlement would differ from the “unimplemented agreement to stabilize the conflict of 8 years ago.”
- Earlier, Kissinger stated that he advocated the role of Ukraine as a buffer zone between Russia and the West. According to the words, this allegedly “would better serve his stability.”