In his latest column on Mizane.info, Daniel Milan paints a portrait of the France politician of the moment and her business of political diversion, of which Islam is a textbook case.
It must be understood that the last three successive governments in particular and most of the political parties and the French media, are only at the service of 4 or 5 ideological, corporatist and financial castes. They are the real power and consider themselves owners of France and the French. Everything revolves around them, via their political personnel chosen for their servility. Their mode of government is based on surveillance, policing, social and political supervision, repression, the tracking of any space of freedom. Their power is based on the manipulation of minds, fear and designation imaginary enemies of the Republic to put most of the population under its control (Muslims, Islam, foreigners, etc.).
They know they have nothing to fear from formatted minds, from the masses motivated by purchasing power and the power to consume. All those who stand out from the ranks or who could possibly stand out from the ranks, by their opinions, their lifestyles, are considered as potential “deviants” suspects.
We will criminalize “Islamism” (opinion) and “Islamists” on the pretext that some have committed criminal acts, while each individual is responsible for his acts and no one can be held responsible for what he does not a step taken. To do this, we will qualify ordinary Muslims as Islamists (a catchall qualifier that means nothing specific, because any Muslim who practices Islam, his religion, is an Islamist.
The source of all evil
According to situations and occasions, after having deconstructed him by denying him all rights and all humanity, we will reconstruct him under the worst possible traits and we will say of him that he is “anti-Semitic”, “homophobic”, ” to exist “. On the will accuse him of violating the “values of the Republic” and on the qualifier “”enemy”…
All possible and imaginable inegalitarian and exceptional laws will be voted against Muslims to prevent them from expressing themselves and practicing their religion. Imams will be imputed words they never uttered, opinions and intentions they never had. Words taken out of context, uttered 20 years ago, emerged. All this because in their sermons they called on Muslims to take their full part in public life.
In the absence of evidence, we will say that he practices “taqia”…
It is suggested on the television sets – all liberticidal laws begin like this – to close all the mosques which have supported such an imam, the creation of exceptional laws to expel any imam who is not “republican”, so that he does not can appeal.
Through these attacks against Islamism and Islamists, it is obviously Islam and all Muslims who are targeted and denied their rights. We want to prevent them from occupying their rightful place in society. They are denied the right to express other opinions and other values.