We can work well for Poland in quotes
DoRzeczy.pl: The Seym supported the reform of the Supreme Court. New notification based on the reported solution to the problem of liquidated claims related to the liquidation of the Chamber of Sellers and appointed in connection with the referral to the liability office in relation to the defect. Is Solidarna Polska satisfied with this solution?
Sebastian Kaleta: We always have a slightly different development situation in the Supreme Court, or a reform situation, but in the new conditions, with the war in Ukraine and the Commission’s attitude towards Poland, the will and blocking access to funds, we decided to deliver on this project. We have proposed that would dispel doubts about the main problems with this project. After many hours and meetings, we managed to meet for Law and Justice of our meetings. Sense with understanding our comments Chancellery of the President. In order to obtain this information, it turned out that the intentions of your copyright were in line with your intentions, and did not specify specific things. The design has been fixed that we have established that we are setting the following, targeting the ones set by Solidarna Polska and setting the clocks.
What will happen between the Disciplinary Chamber and the Professional Accountability Chamber?
The Disciplinary Chamber – and it was not possible on the part of the European Union – was created as a new job within the framework of the work of the Supreme Court. It consists of judges specially appointed to this chamber, who are not supposed to sit in the Supreme Court. The concept of the DPO assumes that it will be composed of all chambers of the Supreme Court, and groups of judges selected by the President of the Republic of Poland. Thus, that consists of the formulated EU will become obsolete. In connection with the first card, however, what is unauthorized, but – should be unblocked and then you should start from the beginning of the page with the National.
So my “milestones” have been fulfilled? What if the funds are blocked anyway?
I have comments on other politicians and, because I know, I know the content of the “milestones” well. Corrections, Polish acronym salesman, authorizing hundreds of controversies, acquisition that he is not suitable for repair by the EU. There will be a Chamber that no longer Disciplinary, the parties may no longer claim disciplinary action if someone has possession that a judge may be subject to in certain areas. Specialists in deciding judges to decisions of the impaired decision-makers, judges against whom the Disciplinary Chamber ruled, have the property right to the new chamber to verify these rulings. So strong IDs remain valid, and these are also the “milestones”. Importantly, in the course of the work on the act, it was possible to proceed in order to allow a loophole, or to distort this project by questioning the status of the judge. There will be no such possibilities, otherwise everything will be defined.
As for the size, the first such broad agreement between Solidarna Polska, PiS and the President’s Office. Could it be?
The consensus was successful, and that’s good news. At the beginning, everyone could have a different vision, but this is what the coalition is for, and this is what the talks are for, to work out a common position, which is a great common value for the United Right, which has developed a common position so that it is now to take place in the past. What is the opposition doing? Life says to abolish the Disciplinary Chamber, and when it has to vote and liquidate to vote against. All the more it shows their disgrace.
Also read:
Mazurek: Definitely the stupidest and against the opposition in the EUAlso read:
Act on the Supreme Court. Sachajko: We supported it because we have signed programs