‘No return to a 90s-style form of corporate anonymity’
Having taken note of the article with which the newspaper “Information” opened today’s publication, including “the return to a disguised corporate anonymity”, this Secretariat of State considers it essential to make some necessary clarifications. First of all it should be noted that what is reported in the text of the article is not only not, but is also disivo as well as dangerous for the correct reputation of the country. No 90s-style form of anonymity has ever been the will of the Secretariat for Industry, of the professional associations that contributed to the drafting of the law as well as of the Government, of the majority and in general of the political forces all who collaborated. What must be clarified, it must then be specified that the fact that the provision has proposed split the majority does not correspond to reality, indeed in all probability the regulatory device, which will arrive at the second reading Council of May, will be able to confirm a unified vision of everything the political framework. This for two simple but precise reasons: 1) the text of the law before the start of the legislative process was compared, in various meetings, with all the opposition and majority parties that no observation or modification submitted to the Secretariat on this point in question; 2) the text of the regulation, net of some clarifications, was voted in favor and unanimously within the competence of the Finance Committee, so much so that a single rapporteur was appointed for the presentation of the law, which therefore led to the elaboration of a single and shared report, by majority and opposition. Net of political exploitation and power games it would therefore be inconsistent, not serious and completely contradictory as well as incomprehensible, that the political forces today express different positions in the Great and General Council. Having clarified this aspect as well, it is worth dwelling briefly on the text of the article object of criticism, underlining that the principle expressed is not that of an anonymity or a attenuated nineties-style anonymity, as some would have us believe, but rather of the application. to the business world of the European principles already provided for by the legislation on the protection of personal data (European GDPR and San Marino law no.171 of the year 2018, with subsequent amendments). The application of these principles, among other things, respect, will actually lead to results that will not only affect economic competitiveness and costs, but also the issue of safety: nothing new, in summary, to what is already obtainable today through tools already existing with which the same would legitimately be obtained, but with the difference that today they will be managed entirely by the State, which will be able at any time to supervise and access the result to any given data, thus limiting the role of intermediaries who, historically, have evidently created problems to the system through a distorted and elusive use of the instrument of the fiduciary mandate. Confirmed and strengthened therefore transparency and control capacity by the State, to which every type of access is guaranteed at all times and phases, access to some data by private subjects will in fact only be limited, as already foreseen. by the legislation on the protection of personal data, not authorized by the law to know or process them. Therefore any criticism, in this case, is also aimed at the content of this last law and the European principles that regulate it.
cs Industry Secretariat