In rising of China and globally, it is widely used from the region. The common perception in Western societies is characterized as a customer with a general ideological possession within the seller in China. NATO-China relations are not just coming together.
Especially in the last five years, China’s extension has come to the fore as a necessary global. With this perspective in the West, he made it necessary to take advantage of NATO.
In the NATO London Summit Statement in 2019, China was defined as a country that presents both a challenge and an opportunity. In this context, the ‘China problem’ was included in a NATO statement for the first time. From now on, ‘What will happen, is this the state of the NATO-China relationship?’ began to take place in the minds of the questions.
China is the world leader in intelligence by 2030 applications and aims to be supermilitary by 2049 with industrial production. On the other hand, in China, progress is delivered to advance and advance technologies.
The attack that China does not forget
Through the China Belt-Road project, trading terrestrial, builds new links to near and deep critical infrastructure investments. In this way, the Arctic, Middle Eastern and Mediterranean basins do not avoid children from different regions. In the international environment, the increasing systemic competition from the USA and Russia within the pole within the pole rather than the multitude is advancing at full speed. It is not possible for this not to be reflected in NATO-China. However, how it reflects is important.
NATO-China in the Kosovo war on May 7, 1999, because of its deep permission in the incident. The Chinese Embassy was bombed by US planes to be. Talking about the weather that happened after the bombing, talking about the events that took place in the Chinese state, talking about the events that took place in China. Therefore, there is an indelible negative trace in China’s view of NATO. A strange occasion in history is that such NATO has emerged in a way that enlarges the pancakes and encounters with each other.
turning point Afghanistan
Playing in al-Qaeda’s September 11, 2001 game against the United States, and fundamentally revising its agenda in the intervention in Afghanistan. The neighbor of the USA and NATO to Afghanistan, this country and its organization are neighbors to China.
With the general course of NATO in parallel with the start of the ‘War’, Lord Robertson with his first appointment as Ambassador to China in 2002. There was one time high-level contacts between NATO and China regarding those people. The latest meeting September 26, 2021 virtual calendar NATO Headquarters Stoltenberg and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.
Since 2017 China, USA National In Security, Defense and Military Strategy found a stronghold. One of the main victories for the USA came. With China close to the radar of the United States, before then, China was at NATO in strategic reviews and sometimes in voiceovers turned into an actor. At the NATO Foreign Ministers Meeting in Washington in April 2019, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made a very harsh statement about China. Same day December in London Placed in China for the first time in NATO Summit declaration.
The March 2021 Security Biden strategy will be applied to Russia’s future, a China’s Interim National Security document published. He embodied the expressions reflected in the implementation strategy of the USA, which was reflected on the field to China in the Far East. The show was exhibited in September 2021 in the USA-England-Australia.
China in NATO
On the other hand, it resulted from a friction between the USA and the Europeans. It has given new direction and momentum to the EU’s strategic goal of autonomy with the US.
What happened is awaited by an Independent Experts Group made up of these writers’NATO 2030: Togetherness for a New Era‘, a key book was prepared in publication. In this Report, it was characterized as a country with a planned group planning campaign. In any case, it has been determined that China does not pose a military threat to NATO at the moment. How and in what way NATO will steer China is at the entrance to the introductory dairy.
Two sessions of the 79-paragraph Final Declaration of the NATO Brussels Summit held in June 2021 were reserved for China. There are nuances in the way NATO members view China when compared to Russia with other dairy farms. loving before the summit and expressions used in usage were also reflections of the nuances of the Allied countries.
Dealing with China
Thus, while the United States hasn’t gotten them to take a stance face-to-face with its own national assessment of their stance towards China, the wording of the 2019 and 2021 Summit Papers believes that it lives up to a common denominator.
It has been exposed to the pendulum rhythm of the global agenda in the ongoing geopolitics/geostrategic. The last of the pendulum swinging between the two former main centers and Russia is China (added with the USA).
With the smallness of the contagion part of the diaries that are currently on the wide-ranging Middle East North Africa agenda in Ukraine. The sightless, as these US writers were able to plan, do not have the luxury of suffering “on two separate fronts, disabled by Bismarck’s Syndrome.”
In this case, they must seek to engage in dialogue with the ‘eyes for opportunities’ of account. In this process, you communicate with people, with education, with relationships.
In less than two months, the EU will adopt the candidate Strategic Compass on the future. In June 2022, NATO will again approve the Strategic Concept one week from the plan. China’s interest in the perspectives needed to advance this NATO-China dialogue towards a pragmatic understanding based on respect and trust.
In a plan of progress where dialogue fails, the plan of progress is ahead of the challenges. The scenery of this stage situation will be undertaken by the actors and circles that will feed on the tension. It is common sense not to allow this. In this context, it may be possible to develop ideas on how the dialogue between NATO and China can be improved:
NATO is getting tense from the East (Ukraine) these days. This challenge will take its place on the NATO agenda in the medium-long term. This is more, the Alliance members have to include Russia’s future in their strategy for a long time in the current situation.
On the other hand, with regard to transportation beyond China, this country has to resort to increased negotiation talks with Russia. 4 In the 2022 Russia-China Joint Statement, NATO was called upon to abandon “ideology-based Cold War zones” and halt further alliance completion eastward (Ukraine and Belarus). It remains to be seen to what extent this strong call will affect the NATO-China dialogue. “There will be no fee from the Chinese fee. You will also not be able to sit on the ground with additional restrictions, let alone created.
According to the NATO general picture, the current NATO in September 2021 China minister nuclear accidents are considered when considering forces, military docks, transparency of soldiers and weapons. It’s also worth noting that he puts forward any prerequisites for the dialogue. Adopting China’s ambitious dialogue agenda may be difficult. On the other hand, it is not given the information that people in the future are not related to the opinion you make.
Avoiding military risks
An unforgettable acquis emerging from this process is observed in the last learning of NATO-China relations. This backlog can provide a less ambitious framework for a possible dialogue. A “road map” can be applied to this, which will be determined as a first step. How to look at the discussions on the route developed, maritime safety, the debate on the choice of air conditioning, the military-related risk-acknowledgment counter-structure, the nature-man-made cooperation in response, the review of NATO and China? topics such as milk information can be included. Ways that fuel misperceptions or soldiers in the pace of dialogue should be avoided. Priority should be used.
It is not self-reducing for a while, watching the dialogue in its medium. Establishing an institutional framework for its dialogue should be considered. For this purpose, a not too long demonstration ‘NATO-China Consultative Forum’ ‘Joint Working Group’ or may be designed.
“Irbat Bureaus in Brussels and Beijing are something that should be emphasized. Efforts should be made on the Chinese side to bring this idea closer.
We are dada embarking on NATO’s increased engagement with its global partners on China, South Korea, and New Australia, and to see Australia’s standards. In the future, these global partners of NATO and China may come together under a flexible structure. It can come to mind as a future that can stand on a transportation platform again. It’s a goal that serves multilateralism among China’s flag-bearers on the one hand, as the heat is imminent and the tests in the east slightly increase. With China, which can be made this kind of way, another alternative to NATO could be included in the EU. There is no doubt that China’s education will be a topic in cooperation with NATO and the EU.
The challenges of the current security environment are as relevant and relevant to China as to NATO members. Therefore, to achieve the safe balance and to build the improvement of competition on trust and the goal of competition from the basic constructions of the dialogue. “Trying to find a way in the environment” should be the main target in a restructuring that will be established based on consensus.
The subject is not only in the definition of the first statements in the statement of NATO’s 2019 Meeting as Turkey Leader, it is also about being appreciated.
In this context, a plan to further intensify systemic competition may be devised in a way that is not compatible with China’s appropriate ones.
Therefore, NATO’s plans for education will have an understanding of Turkey’s course. It will be Turkey’s readiness to contribute in the track of non-governmental dialogue (track 2), not only by supporting its official efforts as a necessary one.
Those who are interested can access a larger version of this article in English from the link: https://edam.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/220207-NATOChina-2.pdf