He demanded an obstructed approach to the memorial. However, the court did not find any interference with its basic elements. The day of such a state-guaranteed guarantee does not exist first and the complainant is, in fact, not even hard, when it refers only to a bilateral international agreement, or to the law on graves and places of reverence.
The lawsuit filed against the allegedly inconsistent scope of the city council of Prague 6. According to the city court, the council did not proceed with the nobility, but within the framework of the private administration of its property, the lawsuit was thus inadmissible. The owner of the statue is the capital city of Prague. The city takes her in the first place.
He gave him a number of arguments that the statue should not have been removed at all. If someone repeatedly damaged it with paint, the city should take good care of it, not remove it. He pointed to the alleged violation of the agreement between the Czech Republic and Russia on friendly relations and cooperation.
According to the resolution, the constitutional status serves to protect against the interference of the public authorities into the state guarantees of basic rights and freedoms. The intervention must be personal, timely and immediate – such a sculpture was not created. It is not around the state court to examine the activity and inactivity of the public authorities at the general level, then it can only be expressed at the general and even political level, the judges wrote.
The statue of the warlord who took part in the liberation of Prague was led by Prague 6 to be removed from the capital in Bubeni pedloni in April. Against was the Russian embassy, communist or various pro-Russian associations and activists. City Hall announced that the statue would become a bite of the 20th Century Museum of Memory in the future.
Marl Ivan Stpan’s Conv. He led the bloody suppression of the uprising in Hungary in 1956 and worked in Berlin at the time of the construction of the Berlin Wall.