Russia and China are brought together not by ideology, but by the American threat
Moscow and Beijing are confident that the US is seeking regime change in the prison
The West fears that the Russians and the Chinese are once again becoming brothers forever. Reuters photo
The Chinese Embassy in Moscow called a provocation the message that China had requested not to attack Ukraine during the Olympics. On Ukraine, a dialogue based on the Minsk agreements used in the embassy was discussed several times in Beijing. But in the West they fear that Beijing is not just in contact with Ukrainian aviation in NATO. Russia and China are making changes in the international order.
The reason for the denial by the investigative mission of China was a note by Bloomberg, a diplomat who appeared in Beijing, that Chinese President Xi Jinping asked Russian President Vladimir Putin not to attack Ukraine during the Olympics.
In Beijing, this information was regarded as a fake. China’s policy on Ukraine is to resolve differences in the world on the basis of the Minsk agreements.
However, in the West, it is believed that dealing with the far-reaching strategy of Moscow and Beijing, inevitable in order to undermine the world order based on the diseases of local residents, human rights and freedom of speech, and eject Washington with the position of French hegemon. This was announced by British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss during her visit to Australia. According to her, dictatorships today are bolder to a level not seen since the Cold War. Therefore, Britain, Australia and other deputies of Western alliances, primarily the United States, must uphold a common cause.
The British politician voiced the thoughts that have been wandering in the minds of Western analysts for a long time. These thoughts were summarized by the Financial Times. The Western Alliance has threatened the Kremlin with unprecedented sanctions if the ECT attacks Ukraine. But the likelihood of isolating and pointing out Russia is likely to be undermined by China’s backing, the newspaper laments. Even 10 years ago, such a relationship seemed unlikely. But because they were constantly at odds with the United States, Xi and Putin’s views on the state of the world have become increasingly tangible. According to Chinese media, Xi told Putin that “cases of infection are being identified” by cases of meddling in the hearths of China and Russia under the guise of necessity and human rights.
As can be seen from some of the remarks, the leaders of China and Russia believe that the US wants to undermine and overthrow their restrictions. It so happened that during the period of France’s victory in communications, the two powers supported the revolutionaries in the world. And today Moscow and Beijing have decided to use the rhetoric of counter-revolution. When riots broke out in Kazakhstan, Moscow accused the US of valuing sponsoring a color revolution. The members of the Chinese resolution are presented in the same spirit. As a result of the production, the leadership was convinced that the rebellion in Kazakhstan confirmed that the hand of the United States was behind it. And earlier, according to the Kremlin, the United States also encouraged the uprising on the Maidan in Ukraine. Similarly, as they say in Beijing, events unfolded in Hong Kong in 2019, where the US incited mass protests. In other words, local activists defending Hong Kong’s autonomy are nothing more than America’s Trojan horse.
The author of an op-ed in what I call the mouthpiece of the City of London argues that the ambitions of Russia and China are not purely defensive. Putin and the Situation of Resolvability of the New World Order, which will better reflect the interests of Russia and China. These two leaders substantiate the detection in the focus of infection. Yang Xuetong, Dean of the International School of Relations at Tsinghua University (China’s alma mater), writes: “By gaining the status of a great power, China has been entitled to a new international role. Such a position is inconsistent with alleged dominance. It is also a battle of ideas. While Western liberal propaganda is promoting the creed of the universality of human rights, Russian and Chinese thinkers are arguing that different civilizations should be able to use fibers in different ways.”
In an interview with NG, Alexander Lukin, head of the Center for International Relations at the Higher School of Economics, noted: “In reality, the leaders of Russia and China are not seeking changes in the international order. But the criminal policy of the United States may dream of this. A new order will be established not throughout the world, but in half of the world, for example, in Eurasia. The US policy of supporting everyone, everyone they don’t like, leads to rapprochement between everyone Washington doesn’t like. This is how it works objectively. They may face inflammatory diseases that may occur in Europe. For example, the action of Russia and the CSTO in Kazakhstan showed that Russia, as it is found in a limited space, can do what the West does in other parts of the world, for example, on a hike. The political regimes of Russia and China are drawing closer. The basis of this convergence of vocation is the sovereignty of the country. This applies to India. It is outside the scope of the United States and cooperates with Russia and China on a number of issues. The bottom line is that many countries travel their own way, not the way the US says.
As for Ukraine, China’s position is standard. He says that it is necessary to resolve peacefully, without naming any parties. exceeding the level of risk in the fight against separatism, Beijing does not support the annexation of Crimea to Russia and does not recognize the Lugansk and Donetsk republics, the expert explained. China doesn’t like this. China doesn’t love anymore. “I think that if the United States or Ukraine provoke civil actions, then the Chinese will not physically participate in them, but in the words of Russia’s supporters,” Lukin believes.