Complex questionvaccination obligation. In fact, a possible introduction of the measure is at the time postponed and in the political environment one seems to reign some caution, even on the front of relations between majority parties. The last step is the agenda for that asks the Government to prepare the regulatory provisions for the obligation, to be adopted urgently should the pandemic worsen.

There proposal of the obligatory nature of the time arrived from Npr with an amendment that provides for the “fragile” subjects, ie those over 45, excluding those who cannot due to health problems. Before arriving at a mandatory measure, today supports the A.D, it is necessary to do legal, health and technical checks. If the situation requires it, the Pdcs continues, we will have to be ready after having made the relevant checks.

Net remember that the agenda is the result of a mediation between political forces. The sensitivities in the Movement are different on the subject, but one legal study and substantial, by network, it is necessary. Recently the opposition between the Movement and the ally Motus Liberi tomorrow. These are things that “in the majority it doesn’t have to happen“, Let the Net know, which therefore invites us to reflect. “We are interested in concentrating on projects and never stop doing constructive criticism“, Comments, for its part, Domani Motus Liberi who, with regard to the obligation, speaks ofimportance of doing checks first, from the health front to the legal one. The political force spoke about upcoming and future projects during the board meeting on Saturday 22 January.

We for the Republic, through a press release, he says he is certain that the pandemic can happen fight only by following science. With the agenda, a “clear and non-ideological orientation“. Denise Bronzetti and Sandra Giardi, of Mixed Majority Group, affirm that they have “responsibly shared the agenda in which no obligation is inserted” and reserve the right to evaluate any checks.

It is among the oppositions that register the more lasting reactions. Rossano Fabbri, of Mixed minority group, Talks about “downward brokerage“. “Fundamental rights are treated as if they were meat for slaughter”, writes Fabbri with reference to the method. Free look at the vaccination as the only effective tool and, with regard to the work in the Council, he speaks of an “obscene spectacle” in front of an “already split majority”. A situation that, for the party, creates “tensions in the population that they should avoid”. For Future Republic the agenda is a “political joke in which the DC has asked for proof of loyalty”. Rf on obligation has not yet reached an internal position. But one thing for the party is certain: “The majority is at the end of the line”.