“It is certainly a guarantee, for all San Marino citizens, that today’s Court, headed by a magistrate of undisputed international fame such as President Canzio, can play its role with impartiality and free from any conditioning”.

You affirm it Net, underlining in a note that “the conclusions of the Commission of Inquiry on the banking system detect older and more recent responsibilities, especially during the last legislature“.

L’agenda, “Signed by the majority and strongly supported by Rete, censures any political responsibility for bank failure, firmly condemning both the political decisions of the late 1990s and what happened in the last legislature – the government movement points out -; censures and sends to the Court for any further fulfillment, as regards the 90s and 2000s, the madness of the financial center, the granting of banking and financial licenses for business purposes, the absence of adequate controls and the failure to sign the agreement cooperation with Italy; censures and sends to the Court for any further fulfillment, as regards the last legislature, the criminal plan hatched against the San Marino financial system and the choice of the then government to endorse the criminal plan of the ‘Confuorti / Grandoni group’ “.

“From the report of the Commission of Inquiry it emerges, in fact, that San Marino was prey to external interference with the complicity of power groups still present in the territory today, which have favored its aims rather than opposing – adds Rete -. In addition to this, the agenda gives a mandate to the Congress of State and the Cassa di Risparmio to take immediate action, in light of the ordinance that dismantles the accusatory system of the ‘Varano’ trial, to claim any reimbursement of the patrimonial and reputational damage unjustly suffered“.

The same provision also “gives a mandate to rapidly implement the anti-corruption regulations, committing i members of the Great and General Council to present not only i income received, but me too assets, I charge and the equity investments, highlighting any conflicts of interest “.

“Unlike the other agendas, presented by the opposition and some scattered people, who suffered from squint, censoring one or another phase of the problem, forgetting what happened in more distant years or just a couple of years ago – finally says the movement majority – each we can represent the approved one, censoring certain policy of the time, can represent a starting point for solving the problems that have emerged so that they do not happen again and while waiting for the Judiciary to do its part if it deems it has sufficient evidence for criminal, civil or administrative actions “.