The promises to be hot: at least five agendas which will be brought to the attention of the Chamber. Due – as anticipated – those of RF. Free he has just as many ready. ! they call for transparency on politicians with debt exposures above a certain threshold, part omitted in the long conclusive. If though Repubblica Futura asks to extend the work of the Commission of Inquiry to deepen the investigation of politically exposed persons, Free urges the Finance Commission, in order to arrive at a regulatory provision that defines the methods of publication of holders of non-performing loans most relevant.

There Majority, for its part, works on a single device, based on a text formulated before the discussion is postponed to the new year. Mediation is sought. Net see everything responsibility throughout the 20 years of San Marino political history, without underestimating the situations, therefore taking into account all the wrong choices – declared Emanuele Santi – starting from the financial center and without forgetting the failure to sign with Italy. There A.D, while not denying the origin of everything, focuses attention on the three years of the Government of Ora.sm, guilty – Manuel Ciavatta reiterated yesterday – of having aggravated the situation, bringing the country to its knees.

A few hours from the final discussion, Denise Bronzetti of the mixed hopes that theagenda can be one and shared, “Taking into account the results of an important work, which has plumbed – he says – the last 20 years of the banking and financial sector, and which will make all responsibilities emerge clearly, no matter who. In the same way – he continues – if they go in this direction, we will pay attention to the agendas proposed by the opposition ”.

For its part, Motus Liberi tomorrow reiterates the total extraneousness both as a political force and as individuals with respect to the events of the twenty-year period, “a position – remarks Gaetano Troina – which has allowed us, in commission and today, to last super partes and objective evaluations”. It is therefore expected that the agenda will reflect this position. “If the common will is bring out in a transparent way what is and what has been, no problem – he says – we have nothing to hide ”. Regarding the names of the debtors, however, believes that it is not correct to publish them “without reconstructing the dynamics that led to granting of the loan“.