Varano trial, in the order the severe judgment of the Court of Forlì
It took 500 pages and almost 13 years: but the disputes, as they are written, are not clear style considered too discursive at times, in other points the “editing technique” translates into a lack of clarity. It is with a very severe judgment that the Court of Forlì refers to the prosecutors on Varano file.
In general, the accusations made by the Prosecutor in the ‘Varano’ trial, one of the strands of the Carisp case with 30 defendants, “they are not at all sufficiently stated in clear form “. A measure that blocks a process that has had very high personal social costs, as in all procedural events that could result in pre-trial detention in this case. Economic and reputable for San Marino: involved former managers and employees of Carisp, by hypothesis of recycling, unauthorized banking and finance And criminal association which could take place, according to the prosecution, between 2004 and 2009. But, as noted by an ordinance. “The broad premises contain superabundant elements, come for example le digressions made regarding the regulatory framework with regard to the exercise of banking activities, far from merely compiling, but clearly aimed at supporting the accusatory thesis, as if it were a partisan memory “, writes the court in its order. The accusation, we still read “renounces to operate its function of synthesis between the abstract and the concrete case”. It is therefore no longer perceptible “which is the accused person, the material behavior assumed, the causal relevance of the same for the purposes of the injury of the good by the protected norm, of the awareness or not of the conduct or of its collaboration with other cores. “And now you start all over again.
In the video the interview with Moreno Maresi, who in the proceedings defends 8 defendants including the former director Carifin Gian Luca Ghini