They come back the numbers are the protagonists: beyond 1 billion and 500 million of public money disbursed by the state for repair bank failures. Figures that weigh, on the eve of the financial and in light of the issue of new public debt securities. For the former president Gerardo Giovagnoli the time has come for conclusions, and he hopes that we can get out of the debate with something useful for the country. After having dissected the problems of the system – he points out – we are back to zero point. from here an invitation to look forward, reflecting on the preparation of the system in relation to international isolation, questioning the role of San Marino with respect to Italy, the European Union and rest of the world.

also for Vladimiro Selva it is important to understand where we went wrong to continue to serious banking. First, however, he asks to start from the final bill, with one Savings Bank which, alone, has weighed on the shoulders of the state for over 850 million. Point your finger at the licensing for bribes to those who had not requisitioned, with Dc and Ps which – he attacks – “have opened a phase that has led us to that one and a half billion hole”. They bounce accuse crossed, with Gino Giovagnoli that if on the one hand he apologizes for the faults of the Pdcs in the infamous 90’s and recognizes the extraneousness of Rete and Domani Motus Liberi on the other attack Now.sm, “that in just three years – thunders – he did unprecedented damage in history”.

There is an open wound: “politics is responsible when it remains impassive in the face of evidence of unprecedented gravity. The former majority gave free rein to delinquents “– he claims Francesca Civerchia. “Now.sm” – adds to the dose Adele Tonnini – “gave the coup de grace, allowing the puppeteer handling his puppets. Without guarantee and control “. Among the Commissioners there are also who, how Miriam Farinelli, takes the distances “From the severe judgment” on the former Finance Secretary Simone Celli, that profound repercussions has had about his personal life. He speaks of persistence that demolishes the person, recalling that “behind the actions there are men”, all the more – he adds – without elements that confirm complicity with the so-called clique. “Celli didn’t steal, he didn’t get rich, he didn’t pocket money. It’s far from politics, they will have to defend themselves in court, let him rebuild his life ”.

Report in hand, there are many questions. If the Secretary Andrea Belluzzi, which looks beyond the “condemnation of individual political weaknesses, which belong to justice”. One, above all: “What our system can do so that certain situations no longer occur? “. look at the exchange of information, to collaboration between states, to tools that institutions should equip themselves with. “The country must know if there was a criminal design separating criminal liability from political ones“.

While everyone in the Chamber appreciates the historical photograph of the system, there is no shortage of it bipartisan criticism for the absence of conclusions on political responsibilities. “The Commission has thought of delegating them to the Chamber, but we want something more,” he says Mirco Dolcini, which invites you to reflect on banking division between the parties of the time, “A way of doing politics in which Domani Motus Liberi has nothing to do – he says – and that must stop”. Maria Luisa Berti he speaks of a lack of courage and details, in highlighting, for example, whether there were pressures on the banks by politicians to grant credit, often unsecured. He invites us to leave the debate with a mission: “eradicate the weeds and not repeat the mistakes of the past”.

It is not the only one immediately invoke regulations. Rossano Fabbri remember that in San Marino, for money that has disappeared from the banks against the San Marino citizens, there are criminal offenses punished in the same way as a driving state of intoxication. Then ask to introduce adequate penalties, “It’s about the image of the country”. And regarding the absence of names in the chapter on politicians’ debts: “Citizens have a right to know if in the Chamber there are those who defend the general interest or a personal situation “.

the also asks RF, “In this case – he says Andrea Zafferani – there can be no official secret. Another central element: knowing a what point are the actions responsibility. It also urges the Commission to carry out a more in-depth analysis “of that strange notice that brought Grais here. Were there agreements – he asks – between politics and that system? ” Gloria Arcangeloni wishes that the House sets a good example, acting in a selfless manner for the exclusive interest of the country in all areas, not just in the banking sector. In this regard, he recalls the management of various other sectors – such as the ISS – with party logic.

from Iro Belluzzi proximity to the former President of Asset Stefano Ercolani, sentenced just yesterday in the Supreme Court to six years in prison. “The condemnation of these people is condemnation of the system and of the country”.

The debate is proceeding, pending one or more agendas. “We have reached a maturity that allows us to fully analyze all the misdeeds of the last twenty years, not just the last three”, he says Michele Muratori, who hopes for an “intellectually honest” agenda. “You don’t need an odg to say we made a mistake” – comments the Foreign Secretary Luca Beccari – “but for give a development to the sector net of those errors“.