• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • COLOGNE
    • COPENHAGEN
    • CORK
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
    • MADRID
    • MALTA
    • MANCHESTER
    • MARSEILLE
    • MILAN
    • MOLDOVA
    • MONACO
    • MUNICH
    • NAPLES
    • NETHERLANDS
    • NICE
    • NORWAY
    • PARIS
    • PISA
    • POLAND
    • PORTUGAL
    • PRAGUE
    • ROME
    • ROUEN
    • RUSSIA
    • SALZBURG
    • SAN_MARINO
    • SIENA
    • SLOVAKIA
    • SLOVENIA
    • SPAIN
    • STOCKHOLM
    • STRASBOURG
    • SWEDEN
    • SWITZERLAND
    • THESSALONIKI
    • TOULOUSE
    • TURIN
    • TURKEY
    • UK_ENGLAND
    • UKRAINE
    • VENICE
    • VERONA
    • VIENNA
    • WARSAW
    • WATERFORD
    • ZURICH
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • COLOGNE
    • COPENHAGEN
    • CORK
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
    • MADRID
    • MALTA
    • MANCHESTER
    • MARSEILLE
    • MILAN
    • MOLDOVA
    • MONACO
    • MUNICH
    • NAPLES
    • NETHERLANDS
    • NICE
    • NORWAY
    • PARIS
    • PISA
    • POLAND
    • PORTUGAL
    • PRAGUE
    • ROME
    • ROUEN
    • RUSSIA
    • SALZBURG
    • SAN_MARINO
    • SIENA
    • SLOVAKIA
    • SLOVENIA
    • SPAIN
    • STOCKHOLM
    • STRASBOURG
    • SWEDEN
    • SWITZERLAND
    • THESSALONIKI
    • TOULOUSE
    • TURIN
    • TURKEY
    • UK_ENGLAND
    • UKRAINE
    • VENICE
    • VERONA
    • VIENNA
    • WARSAW
    • WATERFORD
    • ZURICH

PORTUGAL

Panorama in Portugal has changed and “it is more difficult to detect and punish”. Governments are “always a step behind”

Sugar Mizzy December 9, 2021

This Thursday marks the International Day against Corruption, a problem that continues to be felt in Portugal, with “great corruption and the capture of public policies”, according to the organization ‘Transparency International Portugal’.

In responses expressed to Multinews during this day, the organization explains that “it was on this day, in 2003, that the United Nations Convention against Corruption was signed. Therefore, it is a day for governments, businesses, civil society and the entire population to renew their commitment to work together to end the devastating impact of corruption on the lives of people around the world”.

The organization considers that in Portugal, in terms of corruption, “there have been advances, setbacks and stagnation. Portugal in 2021 is not Portugal in 1980. Petty corruption at the level of civil servants is no longer a fundamental problem”, secret.

Even so, “the so-called great corruption and the capture of public policies remain, in which there may not be a bribe, a direct exchange of favors, but there is a systemic private benefit and over time, which is more difficult to detect and punish – judicially and politically”.

“At the international level – and with effects in Portugal – we are witnessing a strengthening of kleptocratic regimes, in other words, in which an elite remains in power with the aim of plundering State resources for their own benefit. And the issue is that even in countries and regions with more democratic traditions we are witnessing a deterioration of regimes and institutions”, he reiterates.

Despite admitting that “there have been improvements”, Transparency International emphasizes that this happens “always in slow response to new forms of corruption and policy capture. Or, in other words, corruption advances and, in response, governments, international associations and civil society have also advanced, but always a step backwards”.

“The international community has finally woken up to the problem of kleptocracies and how their elites abuse the systems of democratic countries to hide the fortunes they steal from their countries. This week, for example, the US government approved its first anti-corruption strategy and that is good news”, he says.

In the same sense, “in Portugal, the issue of entry once and for all on the public and political agenda. In terms of research, too, great progress has been made in the last decade. The big obstacle is that the political power continues to respond to the challenges by creating new laws that, afterwards, are no more than paper. Corruption is prevented in practice and not just in the Penal Code”, he warns.

Asked what can still be done to improve the Portuguese image in this context, the organic organism that “the issue is not the image. This is an obsession of political power. You can have a good image because you interpret statistics in a convenient way, because you only consider the law and not the practice, because you only look at the part of reality that is convenient”, he said.

“The important thing is to ensure that decision-making processes are fair and transparent, that institutions have effective means of prevention and detection, that people feel safe to report irregular practices and that justice works. Correcting the reality will ultimately improve the image. That doesn’t happen anymore”, he concludes.

Problem remains a “concern” in Portugal

The Corruption Prevention Council considers that this issue continues to be a “concern” in Portugal and in the world. The organism’s source refers to the Multinews that they see “With concern and awareness of the much that has been done to prevent and combat it, but also the much that still needs to be done to eradicate it.”

“In some aspects”, the organization considers that “there are clearly improvements, as is the case of greater transparency in public life, at national and international levels”. However, “this is a phenomenon that concerns everyone and in which we believe that education plays a fundamental role”, he completes.

“That’s why the Corruption Prevention Council celebrates this day at the Maria Amália Vaz de Carvalho Secondary School with live broadcasting to all public and private schools in the country, thus also betting on the new generations”, he reinforces.

For the Council, it is important to “continue with this concern on the agenda and in practice on a daily basis, all the mechanisms that already exist”.

Thus, he adds, it will be possible to “also improve the articulation between all the entities involved, from the political-legislative bodies to entities with functions of prevention, investigation and repression”, he concludes.

Portugal among countries with high risk of corruption in Defense

Portugal is among the countries with a high risk of corruption in the Defense sector, despite having registered some improvements compared to 2015, revealing an assessment by the organization Transparency International (TI).

In TI’s assessment of 86 countries, Portugal appears in the group of countries with a high risk of corruption in the Defense sector, with 44 points out of a possible 100, below the European average (59/100).

“The results for Portugal show a positive evolution compared to 2015 data, with emphasis on the thematic areas of political risk and risks associated with personnel management, but there are still problems in the prevention and mitigation of risks arising from the lack of supervision ”, referred TI in the publication Government Defense Integrity Index 2020, which assesses the quality of institutional controls to manage corruption risks in defense and security institutions.

In a statement to Lusa, Karina Carvalho, executive director of TI Portugal, said that “some improvements were registered compared to 2015, but the results regarding the operational area are still far below what would be expected, especially for a country that has responsibilities at the international level” .

“What we are saying is that there has to be more transparency”, said the official, declaring that in the defense sector “there is little published information”.

Related Posts

PORTUGAL /

Portugal is the EU country with the most new cases of covid-19 (and the second in the world)

PORTUGAL /

Pedro Neto dismissed on the first day of Portugal under-21 concentration

PORTUGAL /

APD Leiria wins ACR4 Portuguese Cup

‹ PALOP students will be able to do science in Portugal › Nuno Mendes “very uncertain”, Ramos may be back

Recent Posts

  • “Very happy” at ASM, Mitchell wants to relive “beautiful evenings at Louis-II”
  • Albert I of Monaco, Prince of the Oceans, broadcast Monday June 13 at 9:10 p.m. on France 3
  • Sweden completes the 2022 World Cup list
  • Freight trains in Norway: – Reports reveal: Major safety deficiencies
  • Runmageddon Krakow. See what awaits you! – News

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑