The verdict of the Court of Appeal is final, it can only be appealed to the Supreme Court.
The seasoned criminal found her victim last December.
“She pulled out a folding knife and held it with the blade toward the victim. She made no threat, but the victim considered her situation to be completely hopeless. She just kept her purse on her lap, “described the judge of the Brno Regional Court, Andrea Svobodová.
“The defendant cut the strap from her purse with cash and also two credit cards,” the judge added.
Šandorová has already been punished by the local city court, but the woman did not accept the punishment and stubbornly insisted on her innocence, although she was caught by a camera while paying in the store.
The vendors recognized her, and one of the witnesses watched her from the time she ran away from the tram to leaving the convenience store.
“The client does not identify with the fact that the act was proven to her, I emphasize that no recognition was made,” said the woman’s lawyer.
The court punished the woman who pulled out a wheelchair knife.
The client allegedly has a cross tattooed on one of her fingers, which she allegedly was not visible on camera recordings. “I look different!” Said the defendant.
“Three months after the last alternative punishment, she committed a weapon attack against a defenseless person,” the prosecutor said.
However, the Board of Appeal had no doubts about guilt.
“We have a witness who has been watching and taking pictures of her all along. We have records from the convenience store, where she paid stolen cards damaged. The vendors from the convenience store clearly identified her because they knew her personally, “added Judge Svobodová.
In addition, the Board of Appeal pointed out that Shandor had escaped the crime cheaply.
“As the victim describes her mental state after the attack, it seems to us that she could have suffered serious damage to her health,” Svobodová stated.
“There should have been an expert report, then the defendants could face a stricter section with a sentence of five to twelve years. But this is only an academic consideration, there is no appeal by the public prosecutor, “the judge added.
“So I’m supposed to take it for someone else, okay?”