The information of San Marino. “The government renews a trust in Canzio that no one has doubted
The government renews a confidence in Canzio that no one has doubted
in a press release from the evidently threatening tone the executive shows all its caliber
(…) With regard to the most recent attacks reported in a San Marino newspaper, moreover, it is a duty to ask, while guaranteeing maximum freedom of opinion, whether complaints to the judicial authority and its manager can be ethically corrected when the same will find itself expressing an opinion on the same journalists and publishers already sent for trial. (…)
ANTONIO FABBRI – The government intervenes awkwardly, at times inappropriately, bypassing the two raised issues to which it does not respond. But the clarity of the articles published yesterday and the day before yesterday is in fact. Thus, apart from fantasizing about in “inferences” and equally non-existent “vertical attacks”, the ten of the executive appeal to a defect in ethics, forgetting that the ethics of journalists is to bring out the contradictions and the things that are not right , not to hide them; it is that of exercising the rightful right of criticism to control power, not to sanctify it a priori, as those who demand “system” information would like. What, then, is the meaning of the threatening sentence highlighted? That journalists denounced or judged can no longer do their job? Does it mean that whoever decides on that case will not be a third judge because we dared to criticize? Will it not be third because the government, which is a civil party in that distorted case, has in fact already expressed the desire that we be condemned? Who knows what it means … poor country!