corrective measures and novelties between reminders and knots to be solved
The comparison on pensions it goes on, while the possibility of one fades first reading within the year. Yesterday new projections were presented to employers’ associations and trade unions. The text has been supplemented with new features, starting from the retirement age: share 103 account of precocious workers, who will be able to go retired before age 63 if they prove they have more than 40 years of contributions. It is also corrective on strenuous work, we want to make the redemption of graduation years while, for women, it is thought of subscribing one year of contributions for each child born.
There was also talk of Fondiss and the theme of aging and of non self-sufficiency: it is the part of the reform that looks to the future. There remains the crux of public intervention which – says Enzo Merlini of the CSDL – must increase. Yesterday, next to Ciavatta there were the technicians, but the pension reform – continues Merlini – must be tackled in synergy with the other Secretariats, to understand “what the Government wants to do with pensions with respect to public finance”.
For its part, CDLS asks for one overall reform. “We are not for the excerpts”, sends to say Gianluca Montanari. Regarding the timing, “It must be done by 2022”. The social forces agree: reform alone is not enough. “Move to 2036, therefore by suns six years is the deadline for keeping pension funds”, Comments Giorgia Giacomini of Usl, who looks to the Tax Reform, the “great absentee”. Openness to well-being is appreciated, waiting to see good intentions translated in black and white. The protection of long careers, as per the historic UNAS proposal, is defined by Pio Ugolini – a “flagship”. For the rest, “it’s all a question mark”.
What is missing at the moment – he points out – is one tax intervention fee “That it goes to alleviate the concept of you pay more, work more and take less. It is clear – he adds – that we must give priority to those who decide to stay at work despite having reached retirement age “. The time factor should not be underestimated. For Anis pension reform is a priority. To be done quickly. Woe to us, however, “not to take into account social pensions, disability pensions and all companies that do not pay contributions”, states UCS, “in doing so – warns Francesca Busignani – every calculation is distorted”. And solutions that would imply social decline “would trigger – he warns – a recessive vortex for the whole country”.