• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

LUXEMBOURG

Romain Schneider: “Absenteeism in Luxembourg costs 900.8 million euros”

Sugar Mizzy November 23, 2021

The government report in Luxembourg on the absenteeism rate is clear: it is on the rise and is costly. It seems that we are more absent in transport than in the field of finance …

The results of the year 2020 show that the health crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented increase in the rate of absenteeism * which has gone from 3.88% in 2019 to 4.58% in 2020 (+ 17.8%) in Luxembourg.

The magnitude of this increase is reflected both in the evolution of the short-term rate (absences of less than 21 days) as in that of the long-term rate.

Covid-19 and government measures

Among the main factors appearing those which are affected directly from the disease induced by the coronavirus (quarantine and isolation measures, symptoms of the disease, barrier gestures, uncertainties about the evolution of the pandemic, etc.) as well as the measures implemented by the government to counter the spread of the virus (partial unemployment measures, leave for family reasons (CPRF) and generalization of teleworking).

Breakdown of the increase in the absenteeism rate between 2019 and 2020

2019 2020 Variation
Average duration of absence episodes 7.55 days 9.74 days + 28.90%
Share of employees absent during the year 55.8% 56.5% + 1.20%
Average number of episodes per absent employee 2.93 2.7 -7.9%
Average number of days of employment per employee 318 days 324 days + 2%
Absenteeism 3.88% 4.58% + 17.80%

More absent in transport than in finance

The absenteeism rate is between 2.29% in the field of finance and insurance and 6.15% in the sector of human health and social action. In addition, with the exception of financial and insurance activities, the rate of which fell by nearly 12%, all sectors saw their rate increase.

The share of employees absent at least once in 2020 varies from 46% in information and communication) to 75% in human health and social action.

The average number of illness episodes is between 2.3 (Financial and insurance activities) and 3.34 (Human health and social work). The average duration of absences is between 6.8 days (Financial and insurance activities) and 13 days (Transport).

Absenteeism rate by sector of activity17 in 2019 and 2020

3.1% of total compensation of employees

The direct cost of absenteeism, which consists of the amount of the continuation of the remuneration in the event of illness at the expense of the employers (first 13 weeks) as well as the sum of the pecuniary allowances paid by the National Health Fund (CNS) , between 2019 and 2020, from 775.3 million euros to 900.8 million euros (+ 16.2%), thus representing 3.1% of total compensation of employees.

Border countries are no exception!

Social protection expenditure on sickness and health care as a percentage of GDP increased in all EU Member States in 2020. With the health crisis, they have exploded, it is the observation made by the study carried out by Eurostat.

Among the Member States for which estimates for 2020 are available, social protection expenditure on sickness and health care as a percentage of GDP was highest in Germany (11.2% of GDP), fr France (10%) and fr Belgium (8.8%).

Social protection and health care

Nota Bene
* Absenteeism: number of days of absence compared to the number of days of employment

Read Make your tax declaration in Luxembourg and receive your statement 15 days later!

Related Posts

LUXEMBOURG /

Tradition in Luxembourg: “A pleasure to see the light in the eyes of children”

LUXEMBOURG /

A giant semiconductor factory at the gates of Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG /

Politics in Luxembourg: CSV has appointed its champion, Luc Frieden

‹ Lithuania was surprised by the first snow at night – when did we get it the previous year? | Business › OX2 acquires two solar energy projects in Skne, Sweden

Recent Posts

  • Khvicha Kvaratshkelia: The man who will silence Norway – NRK
  • Investigated as possible murder: The police forgot to check the GPS – TV 2
  • Tesla breaks record in Norway – Elbil24
  • (+) Helge and Nikolai will first take Norway – then the rest of the world stands for … – Romerikes Blad
  • I think more people have opened their eyes to Norway after the scalp: – International top level – Eurosport NO

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑