the Osimhen affair comes under scrutiny
Serie A in the sights of Covisoc. On the table of the FIGC federal prosecutor’s office, a report has ended regarding suspicious capital gains that have ended up in the budgets of top-flight clubs. Above all, some operations of Juventus and Napoli are under examination. As for the Azzurri, it is the Osimhen affair with Lille that makes the competent bodies suspicious.
There A league risks ending up in a new fuss. In the crosshairs of the competent bodies, the ben 62 transfers between 2019 and 2021 that ended up under the lens of Covisoc. As the newspaper Repubblica writes today, on the table of the federal prosecutor of the FIGC ended a relationship regarding suspicious capital gains ended up in the balance sheets of Serie A clubs. Above all, they are at risk Juventus and Naples which attracted attention due to the numerous unclear transfers.
Transfers that resulted in fictitious capital gains that served to beautify company accounts. This is the suspicion of the Supervisory Commission on professional clubs chaired by Maurizio Longhi. The FIGC prosecutor, Giuseppe Chiné, took charge of the matter to try to understand if the rules of the Fair Play Financial. Specifically, Juventus produced capital gains for over 40 million euros for a total of 90 in Serie A. Napoli instead risks for the Osimhen affair.
The Juventus and Napoli cases: Osimhen becomes a case for the Azzurri
The bianconeri would have ended up under scrutiny mainly due to the purchases of players like Franco Tongya and Marley Akis that last summer they were exchanged in the deal between the Piedmontese club and Marseille for the sum of eight million euros each. Tongya today plays in the fourth French series while Aké in the U23 Juventus, therefore in Serie C. According to the Covisoc report, the operations to be examined are 21 for a total sum of 90 million even if the total disbursements of the companies have reached 3 million euros.
Var disparity between Roma-Napoli and Inter-Juve but according to the referees “it was an excellent day”
Already last summer, Juventus, within the draft budget 2021/2022, had emphasized how the Commission that supervises listed companies, has signed a check, still in progress, on the capital gains realized by Juventus. An inspection by Consob therefore, pursuant to art. 115, paragraph 1 letter. Specifically, the exchanges with Barcelona in the deal were above all attention Pjanic-Arthur and the one with Manchester City between Cancelo and Danilo. To understand how to take the congruity of the value of an exchange to be established.
In fact, it currently seems impossible to stabilize it, which is why this could only be the beginning of a long inspection ready to expand with the clear objective of creating precise rules on the question of capital gains. Napoli, in addition to Juventus, is the other club that has made Covisoc more suspicious in Serie A. Especially a cause of the purchase of Osimhen and of that curious payment formula which involved the sale of four players to the Lilac valued altogether 20 million. The players in question then returned to Italy: two play in Serie D while the other in Serie C. A quarter, on the other hand, remained at the French club but never took the field with the first team.
window._fpcmp.push(function(gdpr) { !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '2062554930705272'); fbq('track', 'PageView'); //fbq('track', 'ViewContent'); //send custom checkpoints event (function () { var checkPoints = [10, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300].sort(function(a, b) { return a - b; }); //seconds var checkPointIndex = 0; var f = function(){ var data = { instant: checkPoints[checkPointIndex] }; console.log("[FB PIXEL] send custom event ViewContentCheckPoint ", data, " on account " ,"2062554930705272" , " currentTime in seconds ", new Date().getTime() / 1000); fbq('trackCustom', 'ViewContentCheckPoint', data); checkPointIndex++; if(checkPointIndex < checkPoints.length) { setTimeout(f, (checkPoints[checkPointIndex] - checkPoints[checkPointIndex-1]) * 1000) } }; if(checkPoints.length){ setTimeout(f, checkPoints[checkPointIndex] * 1000) } })(); });