The KNHB has accepted the treatment of Teun Rohof and Sander Baart. The case is currently under investigation. The KNHB has recently announced that the case will be brought before the disciplinary committee.
It is still unclear what exactly happened. In a video, Belgian international Thomas Briels was received by Teun Rohof. In the scramble that arose, ex-international was also unable to practice and worked on the perpetrators Teun Rohof to the ground.
Blunder referees clear Teun Rohof on Thomas Briels
It is unclear whether the KNHB is allowed to assess the situation. The question is to have control over the situation. On the basis of this statement, the KNHB may or may not make about the violation. Thomas Briels previously indicated that in his opinion the referees have borne the situation.
Update: KNHB rating
The KNHB announced the following message via its website today: The KNHB was informed last week of three competition moments that take place on the field during the Orange-Red H1 – Amsterdam H1 game on September 26, 2021.
Because these are match moments in the Hoofdklasse Women of Tulp Hoofdklasse Men, and these moments can damage the appearance of hockey sports, the KNHB considers it important that the process of assessing these specific situations and the state of affairs with regard to this specific match is important. to explain.
As a general rule, during a hockey game, the referees directly judge the actions on the field. The judgments that umpires make on the field and decisions they make are untouchable. We call this the ‘Field of Play’ principle. On the field, therefore, umpires consider, for example, whether they consider it necessary to whistle against an action, and whether it is necessary to penalize an action (by giving a free hit or a card).
All actions that have been judged and judged by (one of the) referees during the match are definitively completed. In that case, it can be carried out afterwards, for example by the independent disciplinary committee of the KNHB.
If both referees have declared after a match – and have not judged in connection with this – a match moment, for example on the basis of video images, submit it to the independent T interests committee. The KNHB will then initiate a case. In that case, the Disciplinary Committee will sit down, request various documents for information and will do so.
Orange-Red H1 – Amsterdam H1
During the match Orange-Red H1 – Amsterdam H1 is a case of three actions that executed each other quickly. The umpires have the first two actions (by minimum of both umpires). These actions have been judged on the field. With regard to the third, the umpires indicate this action. They have therefore not assessed this action.
Based on the images received by the KNHB, the KNHB has decided to bring a case before the Disciplinary Committee with regard to the third action.
The KNHB is currently awaiting the announcement of the Disciplinary Committee. Should a lead to a suspension, this will be communicated – as is customary when it comes to a major league of players – via a notification on the list. Overview cards & suspensions. This overview will be used for the next round round.