A basic composition of two new buildings based on Loos’s and Malt’s original design.
Kulturn ddictv is vc not a land that is the protester’s motto against the bourn building of Transgas. The debate about buildings and their protection has resurfaced, which is rejected. The land can be put out. The question is, especially for defects from the period of normalization (still modern and unique), for not to mention architects, they succeeded in enforcing a declining style in totalitarianism and confirmed that their work kept pace at least with the then European, so they lived in the future and progress. Last but not least, for example, the International Hotel from the 1950s, built in the Stalinist style, was included in the list of monuments.
Since the communist era, there is a way to deal with brutalist architecture. The first reaction is to demolish, cultivate or at least rename it. Zero protection from the state of them for a long time, from the urban space irreversibly disappeared buildings, from the park and share sculptures, art tiles, not the original interiors. It will take some time, not to hate to change the walls of buildings changes in respect and understanding. If at least some of the quality buildings of the second half of the 20th century cannot be preserved in the company, we will erase a piece of our own history and cultural memory once and for all, Ondej Hork and the statue of Pavel Karous mention in Prague its consistency comparable to the breeding of Hussite and Nboen fanatics of this world) will not get rid of history, it will just subdue it.
The shame of Prague or the pearl of brutalism?