• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

PRAGUE

Prague 8 wants to sell the torso of the new town hall in Palmovka. Completion would cost too much, he says

Sugar Mizzy March 6, 2019

Eight and a half years after the approval of the project, it seems that Prague 8 has definitely said goodbye to the idea of ​​a new town hall building in Palmovka. The city district is asking the municipality for permission to sell the buildings. “There are not many other solutions at the moment. If this were to happen, the town hall would be financially exhausted and the construction would cost three times the originally planned budget,” agrees Jan Chabr, the councilor’s councilor for property.

It was supposed to be a town hall connected to a shopping center. A project worth a billion crowns. However, the site of the construction, which was approved by the representatives of Prague 8 about nine years ago, has only been a torso of the building under construction in Palmovka for years. The construction stopped five years ago due to disputes between the town hall and the construction company Metrostav.

Now the management of Prague 8 is proposing that the land not be completed and sold by the building. Aktuálně.cz was confirmed by the new mayor Ondřej Gros (ODS). “It is not yet clear how many crowns it should be sold for and to whom. We are just beginning to negotiate this proposal with the capital,” said Gros, who met with city officials on Tuesday.

Prague 8 needs the consent of the municipality for the sale, as it recently received a subsidy of 300 million crowns from the metropolitan management to create a new seat for Prague rescuers from the torso in Palmovka. However, the municipal councilor for Jan Chabr’s property (United Forces for Prague / TOP 09) admits that the city will look for a seat for the rescue service elsewhere, because Palmovka will not be completed quickly enough.

Although the municipality’s management will still discuss the proposal for Prague 8, Chabr supports the sale of land and the building. “There are not many other solutions at the moment. If this were to happen, the town hall would be financially exhausted and the construction would cost three times the originally planned budget,” Chabr told Aktuálně.cz.

Let’s not prolong it anymore

When Prague 8 approved the project of a new town hall with a shopping center in September 2010, investments of 1.1 billion crowns were expected. Metrostav started working on the construction, but after the municipal elections in 2014, the new management of the city district stopped the whole thing and stopped paying for construction work.

According to the then coalition, it was built on the land of the capital and Prague 8, on which it was not to build. The case culminated in a dispute between a construction company and the city district, when all construction stopped. Last November, the company withdrew from the contract.

“The specific reason for the premature termination of the construction contract is the failure to prepare all expert opinions for the so-called preparatory work, which was to be prepared by October 31, 2018. Therefore, we decided to terminate the contract on November 1,” said company spokesman Vojtech Kostiha.

The city district does not agree with the termination of the contract and believes that it is still valid at least until the end of November this year. Nevertheless, he does not expect the building to be completed this year, so he proposes to sell everything.

“Given these facts and the necessity, the city district seems to be the solution to the sale of land and buildings,” in a letter from last week, which Prague 8 addressed to the management of the metropolis and the editorial office Aktuálně.cz is available.

“Failure to address the situation means damage to the capital’s property, where further prolongation may mean lower revenue from the future sale of real estate and an increase in direct costs on the part of the city district,” the letter said.

The end is decided by the party that launched the project

“No decision will be good at the moment,” says opposition councilor Vladislava Vojtíšková (8 lives), adding that the whole story of the Palmovka Center was problematic. The approval of the billion-dollar project fell shortly before the municipal elections and passed by a majority of one vote.

At that time, she led the ODS district, which is still at its head. After the elections in 2010, she ruled with TOP 09 and decided to build the project. “If they had stopped then, we would not have been in such a situation today,” says Vojtíšková.

According to her, however, it was also a mistake to stop construction after 2014 with a new coalition of the CSSD, ANO, and the Green-backed Communists. Several years of cessation of construction work and insufficient conservation of the building led to the building falling into disrepair.

“That’s why even a possible sale will be complicated even now. Who would want something like that? And besides, it can’t be assumed that someone will pay as much for the land with the building as it has cost so far,” adds Vojtíšková. So far, almost 800 million crowns have been invested in the construction at Palmovka, while the authorities of the Prague 8 district remain fragmented in several buildings.

The opposition will live and the pirates, with regard to the possible sale, will want more information from the leadership about how much the completion of the building on Palmovka would cost and in what condition it is now. They want to discuss the topic at a meeting of district representatives next week.

Related Posts

PRAGUE /

Not just Jágr. Statistics of clashes with trams in Prague show the most risky places

PRAGUE /

The Department of Addictology of the General Hospital in Prague is awaiting reconstruction for 220 million crowns

PRAGUE /

Ageless Veselý and Špotáková agreed on the title. After a record Thursday, Krsek will go to the European Championships – Czech Television – Czech Television

‹ The glory of Prague has fallen. Houses and buildings that are waiting for their rescue › Jebobo Bun bo Nam Bo? Even in Prague you can taste unadulterated Vietnam

Recent Posts

  • Lechia Gdańsk – Up Fitness Skra Warsaw 6:26. Rugby players without a medal
  • the Violets described by Hamza Sakhi?
  • Sky: first contacts between Naples and Verona for Casale
  • The Prime Minister greeted Slovenia on the occasion of Statehood Day
  • THE FAMILY OF DANIELA FRANCI THANKS TO HEALTHCARE AND OPERATORS OF THE AOU SIENA

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑