• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • COLOGNE
    • COPENHAGEN
    • CORK
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
    • MADRID
    • MALTA
    • MANCHESTER
    • MARSEILLE
    • MILAN
    • MOLDOVA
    • MONACO
    • MUNICH
    • NAPLES
    • NETHERLANDS
    • NICE
    • NORWAY
    • PARIS
    • PISA
    • POLAND
    • PORTUGAL
    • PRAGUE
    • ROME
    • ROUEN
    • RUSSIA
    • SALZBURG
    • SAN_MARINO
    • SIENA
    • SLOVAKIA
    • SLOVENIA
    • SPAIN
    • STOCKHOLM
    • STRASBOURG
    • SWEDEN
    • SWITZERLAND
    • THESSALONIKI
    • TOULOUSE
    • TURIN
    • TURKEY
    • UK_ENGLAND
    • UKRAINE
    • VENICE
    • VERONA
    • VIENNA
    • WARSAW
    • WATERFORD
    • ZURICH
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • COLOGNE
    • COPENHAGEN
    • CORK
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
    • MADRID
    • MALTA
    • MANCHESTER
    • MARSEILLE
    • MILAN
    • MOLDOVA
    • MONACO
    • MUNICH
    • NAPLES
    • NETHERLANDS
    • NICE
    • NORWAY
    • PARIS
    • PISA
    • POLAND
    • PORTUGAL
    • PRAGUE
    • ROME
    • ROUEN
    • RUSSIA
    • SALZBURG
    • SAN_MARINO
    • SIENA
    • SLOVAKIA
    • SLOVENIA
    • SPAIN
    • STOCKHOLM
    • STRASBOURG
    • SWEDEN
    • SWITZERLAND
    • THESSALONIKI
    • TOULOUSE
    • TURIN
    • TURKEY
    • UK_ENGLAND
    • UKRAINE
    • VENICE
    • VERONA
    • VIENNA
    • WARSAW
    • WATERFORD
    • ZURICH

PRAGUE

The bike is suitable for Smíchov, but suspicious ties spoil the impression, says the architect

Sugar Mizzy July 22, 2016

The issuance of a positive opinion of Prague 5 on the construction of a sightseeing bike worth 200 million crowns provoked a heated discussion among the inhabitants of the Czech capital. However, the appearance and location of the 60-meter attraction is not the only controversial thing in the whole case. The links behind the implementer, Timsbury Capital, are also suspicious.

These were discovered by a non-profit organization Transparency International. The very fact that the company has existed for about a quarter of a year is suspicious, but the ties of its owner, Jiří Havrda, who also works at CHEMPRAH, are especially interesting. Filip Chytrý, who is associated with suspicious contracts for Prague’s IKEM, has a majority stake in it. That is, those that are linked to Roman Janoušek.

Through KAMÍNKA, Havrd is again connected to Jiří Pergl, whose law practice is linked to Ivo Rittig, according to Transparency. The organization is also without the possibility of connecting to the current people from the City Hall of Prague 5. “The effort to invest in Prague is commendable, but it has its advantages. If the influence of the interest group around Janoušek, Rittig, Hrdlička and the current mayor Radek Klíma is proven, it will be a business card that Prague 5 has not escaped mafia influence, “Tomáš Vích, publicist and architect from the AA Vích studio, told E15.

While many architects are reluctant to build a bicycle, according to Vích’s idea, it is not so meaningless. “I will probably surprise conservatives and conservationists, but from a monumental point of view, the construction of a bicycle is acceptable to me, it is even suitable for the character of Smíchov. On the other hand, Prague already has the same attraction in Holešovice; But he also adds that the bike would probably become the same money market as the planned oceanarium under Stalin.

So far, however, the construction of a new attraction has been decided only on the grounds of Prague 5, where it was approved. It will now be the turn of the conservationists, who plan to issue a negative opinion on the entire project. The construction permit was also not smooth. “I consider this project unworkable, it is with regard to my expertise related to monument care. I voted against the construction of the bicycle, I have to respect the democratic majority, “said Tomáš Homola, councilor and member of the Committee on Territorial Development of Prague 5.

The contract is currently being signed, although it is not clear whether construction will take place at all. The operator of the attraction will pay 56,500 crowns per month for renting the space, the contract will be valid for ten years. However, it may be extended for another ten years under the same conditions. “If the investor does not deliver a valid building permit by November 1 next year, the contract expires on this date,” adds Homola.

Do department stores rule Prague?

One of the arguments of Prague 5 councilors why the construction of the bicycle was approved is “cutting off Smíchov from the city center”. If it were to be put into operation and the city part of public life would move to the city district. Vích also agrees with this separation from the rest of Prague, but according to him, a sightseeing bike is not the solution. “Smíchov should take advantage of the architectural uniqueness of the other bank, where the Dancing House of architects Vlad Milunić and Frank O. Gehry is located.”

Visualization of the architect Milunić footbridges

According to Vícha, the starting point could be, for example, Milunić’s project of three footbridges that would span the Vltava. In addition to offering connections to both banks, accessible pedestrians would also be able to move between Střelecký, Dětský and Slovanský ostrov.

Vích also points to a strange concept in the permitting of Prague buildings and a special political and cultural connection. “Instead of Prague trying to create a multifunctional environment a short distance, under special circumstances to build giant shopping centers and administrative zones,” says the architect. According to him, each district should provide its inhabitants with plenty of shopping and leisure opportunities. As the trend in European urbanism of the last fifty years dictates.

Related Posts

PRAGUE /

Three outdoor exhibitions in Prague commemorate the 80th anniversary of the assassination of Heydrich

PRAGUE /

The war in Ukraine was also reflected in the commemoration of the anniversary of the assassination of Heydrich

PRAGUE /

Prague is preparing a new district for 25,000 people. This is what it should look like

‹ Vladimír Starosta: The transfer of goods from road to rail is a utopia › Steam locomotives full of coal and water in Pilsen tested new railway bridges

Recent Posts

  • VIDEO. The Medieval of Toulouse: Visitors to the Prairie des Filtres
  • Delivery bottleneck in Austria? That’s what agriculture says – Austria-News
  • Toulouse: a slap turns to tragedy, the remorse of a fire officer
  • Dr Ferroviaria surrenders to Genova – Sport
  • Baseball A1, San Marino shot to Nettuno, Godo ko by measure

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑