• Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON
europe-cities.com
  • Home
  • City
    • ALBANIA
    • AMSTERDAM
    • ANDORRA
    • ANNECY
    • ANTWERP
    • ATHENS
    • AUSTRIA
    • AVIGNON
    • BARCELONA
    • BELARUS
    • BELGIUM
    • BERLIN
    • BILBAO
    • BORDEAUX
    • BRNO
    • BRUSSELS
    • BUDAPEST
    • BULGARIA
    • CAEN
    • CALAIS
    • CROATIA
    • CZECH_REPUBLIC
    • DEBRECEN
    • DENMARK
    • DIJON
    • DUBLIN
    • ESTONIA
    • FINLAND
    • FLORENCE
    • FRANKFURT
    • GENEVA
    • GENOA
    • GERMANY
    • GLASGOW
    • GREECE
    • HANNOVER
    • HELSINKI
    • HUNGARY
    • ICELAND
    • INNSBRUCK
    • IRELAND
    • ISTANBUL
    • KRAKOW
    • LIECHTENSTEIN
    • LILLE
    • LIMERICK
    • LISBOA
    • LITHUANIA
    • LONDON
    • LUXEMBOURG
    • LYON

PRAGUE

Visionary or a retreat to developers? Prague is preparing new rules for construction

Sugar Mizzy March 24, 2014

Builders are probably waiting for a big change in Prague at the turn of spring and summer. In May, a one-color city council composed of TOP 09 should approve a draft of new Prague building regulations, which have an impact on the appearance of developers in metropolitan areas. However, the opposition claims that the regulations contradict the building law, of which they are an implementing regulation, so they cannot be brought to life.

The draft of the new decree has the ambition to significantly change the rules that investors have so far had to follow in reality. Or they had to ask for exceptions. For example, requirements for the mutual spacing of buildings and land boundaries should be newly defined so that they do not hinder development where it is desired.

This is also related to the deviation from the requirements for mandatory sun exposure of apartments. The number of parking spaces should no longer be specified, but should be determined by the lower and upper limits. Towards the city center, the requirements for the number of mandatory places would be reduced, which should reduce the involvement of individual transport in parts of the city well served by public transport.

The old decree is based on the context of the industrial revolution and supports the spread of the city into the landscape. But the needs of today’s cities are exactly the opposite. The buildings are not solitary and have compact settlements with sustainable demands on transport, technical and social infrastructure, says the author of the new regulations, architect and urban planner Pavel Hnilička, a well-known promoter of the idea of ​​urban densification.

“We don’t have hygiene problems today like we did a hundred years ago. We are bothered by the occupation of land, the decline in the quality of public space, the high cost of transport infrastructure and technical equipment. Unthoughtful requirements for building distances, sun exposure or noise limits negatively affecting the character of new construction. According to current decrees, Ořechovka or Vinohrady would not be able to be built again, “Hnilička performs, which is the basis for approving the regulation.

The new decree does not smell especially of the city districts and the opposition

The new building regulations will change the decree from 1999. 1744 comments were received at the Prague City Hall. “We want to deal with each of them and deal with it,” says Hnilička. The city districts and the opposition in particular react with distrust to the news. There is often concern from individual town halls about the reduction of parking spaces and legal uncertainty. The Prague building regulations are linked to the emerging Metropolitan Plan. Optimistic estimates say it could be approved sometime during 2017.

“I am afraid that what TOP 09 is preparing at the city level would significantly damage the central part of Prague and make them a permanent construction site for several decades. I also do not understand why the prepared decree softened the rules for the construction of parking spaces for new development projects. It smells more like a small home for designers, architects and developers, rather than protecting the interests of Praguers, “says Vladimíra Ludková, Deputy Mayor of Prague 8.

Opposition: The proposal is in conflict with the Building Act

The opposition is convinced, and yet based on the comments of the Ministry of Regional Development, that the entire draft of the building regulations is in conflict with the Building Act, so it is not possible to bring it to life. “The city thus threw away several years of work and considerable funds, which they invested in the preparation of a new zoning plan and Prague building regulations. The TOP 09 policy will once again slow down the development of our city, “states Filip Humplík, chairman of the Prague ODS.

On the contrary, developers usually welcome planned changes and evaluate them as a visionary act. “The authorities should speak in the form of public spaces, but they should leave a looser hand from investors in the construction of the apartments themselves. We will probably have a hard time building dark dungeons at the four-jet stream. We would not sell them, “says Evržen Korec, head of Ekospol. However, according to him, the existing regulations work rather the opposite. Clients who are looking for the cheapest apartment on the subway must also force state parking. Otherwise, they would remain “in stock”.

“It simply came to our notice then. Now we are mainly limited by the requirements for building distances. We consider the degree of sun exposure to be complete survival. Why couldn’t it be oriented to the north with a normal unit, but with a studio where the owner cannot have his permanent residence registered? ”Asks Leoš Anderle, a representative of Sekyra Group.

Unlike Evžen Korec, he is more worried that the new regulations will not limit the maximum number of parking spaces too much. “For luxury apartments, where the client likes to pay extra for two parking spaces, or for administrative areas that are connected to car traffic, we need enough parking spaces,” adds Anderle.

Developers are now wondering how they prepare new projects – will they take care of themselves or are they already following the new rules? “The part of the regulations that is not directly linked to the Metropolitan Plan will apply,” assures Tomáš Ctibor, director of the Institute of Planning and Development of the Capital City of Prague.

They will have to wait for the requirements of the street and building lines, which all have in the spatial planning again a tradition of interconnection of public and private space. “Before we have a greater degree of legal certainty that someone will not successfully challenge our projects for this reason, and we will have to redesign project documentation for tens of millions, we would rather draw according to current regulations,” adds Anderle.

Related Posts

PRAGUE /

HC Sparta Prague » PLZ – SPA 4:3sn

PRAGUE /

WATCH: Vary took a point in Prague after a five-set battle

PRAGUE /

The commission in Bohnice mistakenly attributed the win to Babiš. They won’t fix the results anymore

‹ Prague 7 wants to take care of the Exhibition Center. He doesn’t want to leave it to the capital city › German airports are planning a strike. It will probably also affect lines from Prague

Recent Posts

  • Erdogan says that Finland can join NATO without Sweden
  • HC Sparta Prague » PLZ – SPA 4:3sn
  • WATCH: Vary took a point in Prague after a five-set battle
  • Turkey’s Erdogan signals that Finland’s NATO bid may be considered over Sweden
  • THE BALL – Patrícia Sampaio wins the Portuguese Grand Prix (Judo)

Categories

  • ALBANIA
  • AMSTERDAM
  • ANDORRA
  • ANNECY
  • ANTWERP
  • ATHENS
  • AUSTRIA
  • AVIGNON
  • BARCELONA
  • BELARUS
  • BELGIUM
  • BILBAO
  • BORDEAUX
  • BRNO
  • BRUSSELS
  • BUDAPEST
  • BULGARIA
  • CAEN
  • CALAIS
  • City
  • COLOGNE
  • COPENHAGEN
  • CORK
  • CROATIA
  • CZECH_REPUBLIC
  • DEBRECEN
  • DENMARK
  • DIJON
  • ESTONIA
  • FINLAND
  • FLORENCE
  • FRANKFURT
  • GENEVA
  • GENOA
  • GREECE
  • HELSINKI
  • HUNGARY
  • ICELAND
  • INNSBRUCK
  • ISTANBUL
  • KRAKOW
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
  • LISBOA
  • LITHUANIA
  • LUXEMBOURG
  • LYON
  • MALTA
  • MARSEILLE
  • MILAN
  • MOLDOVA
  • MONACO
  • MUNICH
  • NAPLES
  • NETHERLANDS
  • NICE
  • NORWAY
  • PARIS
  • PISA
  • POLAND
  • PORTUGAL
  • PRAGUE
  • ROME
  • ROUEN
  • RUSSIA
  • SALZBURG
  • SAN_MARINO
  • SIENA
  • SLOVAKIA
  • SLOVENIA
  • STRASBOURG
  • SWEDEN
  • SWITZERLAND
  • THESSALONIKI
  • TOULOUSE
  • TURKEY
  • UK_ENGLAND
  • UKRAINE
  • VENICE
  • VERONA
  • VIENNA
  • WARSAW
  • ZURICH

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • September 2008
  • June 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2007
  • January 2002
  • January 1970

↑